The Coca-Cola Formula's Impact On Brand Identity

Coca-Cola is one of the most iconic brands in the world due to its classic taste and signature identity. The journey of Coca-Cola’s secret formula—from its inception in 1886 to the launch of New Coke in 1985, and the subsequent return of Coca-Cola Classic—offers a powerful lesson in understanding customer expectations and brand identity. Here we’ll explore the history of the Coca-Cola formula and how customer reactions to New Coke reshaped the company’s future and taught the business world a valuable lesson about consumer culture.

‍

The Original Coca-Cola Formulas: Medicinal Tonic To Refreshing Soft Drink

In 1885, John Pemberton, an Atlanta-based pharmacist, former Confederate General, and morphine addict, was testing a new nerve tonic, Pemberton's French Wine Coca. A law change the following year prompted the first notable change in Pemberton's cola formula. There was a seemingly dangerous ingredient in the tonic that forced Fulton County officials to act. By May of 1886, the first official sales of the now alcohol-free and freshly renamed Coca-Cola were recorded.

The original formula included coca leaves and kola nuts, which inspired the name. Initially marketed as a cure-all, Coca-Cola's formula evolved from a medicinal drink to a mainstream refreshment in the Atlanta area. Growth started to speed up, particularly after business partner Asa Candler acquired the brand in 1888 following John Pemberton's death and Candler's ousting of Pemberton's alcoholic and opium-addicted son, Charley. Under Candler's leadership, the company expanded nationally and began bottling the beverage for mass distribution by 1895.

"In 1901, the Atlanta Constitution linked the dangers of Black cocaine use to soft drinks containing the drug, which it claimed could “unconsciously cultivate” a drug habit. That same year, Candler called for a change to the Coca-Cola formula, replacing cocaine with heavier doses of sugar and caffeine—and started denying that the soda had ever contained cocaine to begin with." (Gershon, 2024). By 1903, cocaine was fully removed from the recipe due to the shifting public perception of southern Black working class soda drinking. The coca leaves were later replaced in 1904 by de-cocainized coca leaves, a change that was implemented relatively quietly without disrupting the brand’s growing popularity.

The next formula change would come in 1916 after the aptly named court case United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola found the government suing Coca-Cola over the caffeine content of the beverage. Coca-Cola initially won this case, but regulation changes in the following years found caffeine listed as a "habit-forming and deleterious substance". After this, Coca-Cola opted to reduce the level of caffeine from 78.4 mg to 46mg per 12 fl. oz.

The formula's perceived permanence became one of Coca-Cola’s greatest marketing strengths—emphasizing the brand's consistency and tradition in an otherwise fast-developing world. The recipe remained unchanged for decades and became a staple of American taste and culture, particularly in the southern United States (remember that for later).

Due to a spike in sugar prices and changes in taxation, Coca-Cola started making the switch to high-fructose corn syrup as a sweetener in the late 1970s and was using it exclusively in place of sugar in the US by the mid-1980s. This change was met with mixed reception, specifically for those with health concerns about the corn syrup, and those who felt the change was a deterioration of the recipe they knew and loved. Little did those who spoke up then know about what was in store for the future of America's soft drink.

‍

The Rise of Pepsi and the Launch of New Coke

By the 1980s, Coca-Cola was facing stiff competition from Pepsi, which was attempting to become America's cola. The Pepsi Challenge, a series of blind taste tests, demonstrated that a majority of participants h̶a̶d̶ b̶a̶d̶ t̶a̶s̶t̶e̶ preferred the sweeter Pepsi to Coca-Cola. The results of the Pepsi Challenge posed a threat to Coca-Cola’s market dominance. Younger consumers tastes seemed to be shifting toward sweeter beverages.

Worried about losing out to Pepsi, Coca-Cola executives felt driven to act. After extensive taste testing and market research, a sweeter version of Coca-Cola's flagship product, known as New Coke, was born. On April 23, 1985, Coca-Cola announced the decision to completely replace the original formula with New Coke.

Even at the time, this change was historic. Coca-Cola had been marketed as "The Real Thing" (Erickson, 2024) for decades, so replacing the original recipe outright was a major statement that later proved contentious. The motivation for the decision was clear: win back younger consumers who preferred Pepsi’s sweeter taste, and ensure Coca-Cola remained competitive in the evolving marketplace. All of the market research conducted had suggested that consumers would embrace the change.

‍

The Backlash: “We Want the Real Thing!”

While Coca-Cola remained confident in the new product and saw some initial positive reception in test markets, consumer response quickly grew to become overwhelmingly negative after the official introduction of New Coke. Within a few days, Coca-Cola’s phone lines were flooded with angry calls. Loyal fans of the brand were furious, not just because of the change in taste, but also because of what New Coke represented: a betrayal of the tradition and consistency that had defined Coca-Cola for nearly a century.

For many consumers, Coca-Cola wasn’t just a drink—it was a symbol of American culture, stability, and nostalgia. The sudden change to something as fundamental as the formula of America's soft drink sparked a massive outcry, public protests, & boycotts. To some consumers in the South, the change "was an extension of the Civil War... Here was Coca-Cola, a southern company, laying down its arms in deference to its Yankee counterpart... Pepsi, headquartered in Purchase, New York. Coke, the quintessential southern drink, was changing its image and content to conform with the rivals in the North.” Customers began hoarding cans of the original formula, and protests were organized to demand its return.

The backlash highlighted a critical error in the market research conducted by Coca-Cola: an underestimation of the attachment customers had with the original formula. Extensive taste tests and market data had only focused on one thing: flavor preference. No thought had been given to the intangibles that drive customer loyalty: things like tradition, familiarity, and identity. Modifications to products can have significant effects on the perception of the brands that produce them, and restricting an already widely trusted product can result in frustration at best or panic at worst.

‍

Coca-Cola Classic: A Brand Reborn

Coca-Cola's executives soon realized their mistake. 79 days after the initial launch, on July 11, 1985, the company announced the return of the old formula as Coca-Cola Classic. The media and public hailed the move, and sales of Coca-Cola soared for several months following the reintroduction. The decision also highlights the importance of customer feedback. Reacting quickly to the outcry from consumers, Coca-Cola repaired its damaged reputation among dedicated customers and managed to enhance the dynamic relationship between the brand and its consumers. The failed launch of New Coke quickly demonstrated how much people loved the original formula, which resulted in a boost to Coca-Cola Classic sales and overall brand loyalty upon its release.

Though New Coke remained available for several years, its prominence rapidly faded, and Coca-Cola Classic once again became the focus of the public and the company. After several attempts to further promote New Coke (namely the "Catch The Wave" campaign featuring digital TV personality Max Headroom in the late 80s, and the rebranding of New Coke to Coke II in 1990), the product was finally discontinued for good in July 2002.

‍

Lessons To Be Learned from the New Coke Saga

The story of New Coke offers several important lessons for marketers about product innovation, customer expectations, and brand identity:

1. Emotional Bonds Are Meaningful: Coca-Cola’s market research focused on taste preferences, but it failed to account for the profound emotional connection customers had with the brand. Consumers often form attachments to a product that goes beyond its functional attributes. In Coca-Cola’s case, the formula was tied to a sense of nostalgia and identity, which no taste tests could replace.
2. Brand Consistency Is Key: By the time New Coke launched, Coca-Cola had spent nearly a century building its identity around tradition and consistency. By changing its formula, it undermined the values it had promoted for decades.
3. Listening to Customer Feedback Matters: Coca-Cola’s quick action in bringing back the original formula demonstrated that the company was willing to listen to its customers. This action helped mend the damage to its brand and allowed Coca-Cola to emerge stronger from the ordeal.
4. Innovation Requires Caution: Changing an iconic product can be highly risky, even if market research suggests the change is called for. Companies need to strike a balance between innovation and maintaining core brand attributes. For Coca-Cola, New Coke was an experiment that revealed just how powerful the brand’s original identity was.

‍

The Long-Term Impact

The launch of New Coke remains one of the most fascinating case studies in marketing history. While the process started disastrously for Coca-Cola, the quick course correction helped the brand re-establish itself as a global powerhouse. Coca-Cola’s legacy has only been strengthened by this incident, as it demonstrated the company’s ability to pivot based on consumer response, and ultimately learn from its mistakes. In the end, Coca-Cola’s biggest misstep turned into one of the greatest marketing lessons ever demonstrated.

‍

‍

Sources:

Erickson, D’arcy McCann. “The History of Coca-Cola’s It’s The Real Thing Slogan - Creative Review.” Creative Review, www.creativereview.co.uk/its-the-real-thing-coca-cola/. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

Gershon, Livia. “Who Took the Cocaine out of Coca-Cola? - JSTOR DAILY.” JSTOR Daily, 3 June 2024, daily.jstor.org/who-took-the-cocaine-out-of-coca-cola/.

Magnates Media. “The Disturbing History of Coca-Cola.” YouTube, 19 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELu8y6eK-0g.

Muse, Tyler. “Coke Corn Syrup.” When Coke Started Using Corn Syrup, 29 May 2023, www.historyoasis.com/post/coca-cola-corn-syrup.

Philpott, Tom. “The Secret History of Why Soda Companies Switched from Sugar to High-Fructose Corn Syrup.” Mother Jones, 26 July 2019, www.motherjones.com/food/2019/07/the-secret-history-of-why-soda-companies-switched-from-sugar-to-high-fructose-corn-syrup/.

“The Sweet and Sour History of Sugar Prices.” Winton, 6 Apr. 2017, www.winton.com/longer-view/the-sweet-and-sour-history-of-sugar-prices.

“United States v. Coca Cola Co. of Atlanta, 241 U.S. 265 (1916).” Justia Law, supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/241/265/. Accessed 8 Oct. 2024.

‍